Queen's University - Utility Bar

QSpace at Queen's University >
Engineering and Applied Science, Faculty of >
Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Department of >
Joshua M. Pearce >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1974/5297

Title: Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Inducing Energy Conservation and Distributed Generation from Elimination of Electric Utility Customer Charges
Authors: Pearce, Joshua M.
Harris, Paul J.

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Energy Conservation from Merged Utility Rates final preprint.pdf996.6 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Keywords: carbon dioxide
distributed generation
energy conservation
energy efficiency
energy policy
electricity conservation
green house gas
utility rates
Issue Date: 2007
Publisher: Elsevier
Citation: J. M. Pearce and Paul J. Harris, "Reducing greenhouse gas emissions by inducing energy conservation and distributed generation from elimination of electric utility customer charges", Energy Policy, 35, pp. 6514-6525, 2007.
Abstract: This paper quantifies the increased green house gas emissions and negative effect on energy conservation (or “efficiency penalty”) due to electric rate structures that employ an unavoidable customer charge. First the extent of customer charges was determined from a nationwide survey of U.S. electric tariffs. To eliminate the customer charge nationally while maintaining a fixed sum for electric companies for a given amount of electricity, an increase of 7.12% in the residential electrical rate was found to be necessary. If enacted, this increase in the electric rate would result in a 6.4% reduction in overall electricity consumption, conserving 73 billion kW-hrs, eliminating 44.3 million metric tons of carbon dioxide, and saving the entire U.S. residential sector over $8 billion per year. As shown here, these reductions would come from increased avoidable costs thus leveraging an increased rate of return on investments in energy efficiency, energy conservation behavior, distributed energy generation, and fuel choices. Finally, limitations of this study and analysis are discussed and conclusions are drawn for proposed energy policy changes.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1974/5297
Appears in Collections:Joshua M. Pearce

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Creative Commons

Items in QSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.


  DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2008  The DSpace Foundation - TOP