Queen's University - Utility Bar

QSpace at Queen's University >
Graduate Theses, Dissertations and Projects >
Queen's Graduate Theses and Dissertations >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1974/7580

Title: The Principle of Procreative Beneficence is Eugenic, but so what?
Authors: Hotke, ANDREW

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Hotke_Andrew_201209_MA.pdf108.83 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Keywords: Procreative Beneficence
Issue Date: 9-Oct-2012
Series/Report no.: Canadian theses
Abstract: In response to the possibilities for selection created by reproductive technologies like IVF and Prenatal screening, Julian Savulescu has argued that parents have a moral obligation to employ selective technology in order to have the best child that they can possibly have. This idea, which Savulescu has called the Principle of Procreative Beneficence, appears reminiscent of historical eugenics. However, Savulescu has argued that this principle is not eugenic. In this paper I argue that there are good reasons to think that the Principle of Procreative Beneficence is eugenic. Specifically, I argue that this principle shares five common features with historical eugenics which justify the conclusion that it is eugenic. However, while I argue that this principle is eugenic, I argue that it is not morally problematic for that reason because the shared features of historical eugenics and the Principle of Procreative Beneficence, which justify the claim that the principle is eugenic, are not morally problematic.
Description: Thesis (Master, Philosophy) -- Queen's University, 2012-10-08 22:23:59.333
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1974/7580
Appears in Collections:Queen's Graduate Theses and Dissertations
Department of Philosophy Graduate Theses

Items in QSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.


  DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2008  The DSpace Foundation - TOP