<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>QSpace Collection:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/1974/1909" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>http://hdl.handle.net/1974/1909</id>
  <updated>2013-05-24T01:51:05Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2013-05-24T01:51:05Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Passion and Persuasion</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/1974/1918" />
    <author>
      <name>Leighton, Stephen</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/1974/1918</id>
    <updated>2009-06-03T05:01:54Z</updated>
    <published>2009-01-01T05:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Passion and Persuasion
Authors: Leighton, Stephen
Description: Introduction to Blackwell’s Companion to Aristotle (edited by G. Anagnostopoulos, 2009)</summary>
    <dc:date>2009-01-01T05:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Aristotle’s Exclusion of Anger from the Experience of Tragedy</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/1974/1917" />
    <author>
      <name>Leighton, Stephen</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/1974/1917</id>
    <updated>2009-06-03T05:01:53Z</updated>
    <published>2003-01-01T05:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Aristotle’s Exclusion of Anger from the Experience of Tragedy
Authors: Leighton, Stephen</summary>
    <dc:date>2003-01-01T05:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Aristotle's Account of Anger: Narcissism and Illusions of Self-Sufficiency</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/1974/1916" />
    <author>
      <name>Leighton, Stephen</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/1974/1916</id>
    <updated>2009-06-02T05:01:21Z</updated>
    <published>2002-01-01T05:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Aristotle's Account of Anger: Narcissism and Illusions of Self-Sufficiency
Authors: Leighton, Stephen
Abstract: This paper considers an allegation by M. Stocker and E. Hegeman that Aristotle’s&#xD;
account of anger yields a narcissistic passion bedevilled by illusions of self-sufficiency.&#xD;
The paper argues on behalf of Aristotle’s valuing of anger within a virtuous and&#xD;
flourishing life, showing that and why Aristotle’s account is neither narcissistic nor&#xD;
involves illusions of self-sufficiency. In so arguing a deeper appreciation of Aristotle’s&#xD;
understanding of a self-sufficient life is reached, as are some interesting contrasts&#xD;
between Aristotle's understanding of anger, its connections to value and our own&#xD;
understanding of these matters.</summary>
    <dc:date>2002-01-01T05:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Mean Relative to Us</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/1974/1915" />
    <author>
      <name>Leighton, Stephen</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/1974/1915</id>
    <updated>2009-06-02T05:01:54Z</updated>
    <published>1995-01-01T05:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: The Mean Relative to Us
Authors: Leighton, Stephen</summary>
    <dc:date>1995-01-01T05:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

