Queen's University - Utility Bar

QSpace at Queen's University >
Graduate Theses, Dissertations and Projects >
Queen's Graduate Theses and Dissertations >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1974/6260

Title: Mutual Augmentation of Surveillance Practices on Social Media

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Trottier_Daniel_G_E_201012_PhD.pdf1.43 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Keywords: Surveillance
Social Media
Issue Date: 2011
Series/Report no.: Canadian theses
Abstract: Social media services like Facebook mark the continued domestication of surveillance technology. Facebook has been remarkably successful at establishing a presence within a variety of social settings, including the interpersonal sphere, the academic sector, and the marketplace. As a platform shared by these spheres, Facebook distributes personal information beyond intended contexts. This research will develop a sociological understanding of individual, institutional, and aggregate surveillance through social networking sites. A series of semi-structured face-to-face interviews with students, university administrators and business employees provides a detailed understanding of surveillance practices on Facebook. Three kinds of surveillance are considered. First, lateral – or peer-to-peer – surveillance refers to interpersonal scrutiny between individuals. Second, institutional surveillance is the scrutiny of key populations by universities and other institutions. Third, aggregated surveillance is used primarily by businesses to study relevant markets. I propose that mutual augmentation exists between individual, institutional, and aggregate forms of surveillance on social media. These three models are situated within the same informational platform. By sharing not only the same information, but also the same interface used to access that information, formerly discrete surveillance practices feed off one another. New personal details, criteria, and searching techniques become common knowledge. Marketers and institutions now benefit from ‘user-generated value’ when individuals exchange relevant information amongst themselves. Likewise, university-age users have adopted new criteria like ‘employability’ and ‘liability’ to assess their peers as well as themselves.
Description: Thesis (Ph.D, Sociology) -- Queen's University, 2010-12-31 05:12:00.199
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1974/6260
Appears in Collections:Queen's Graduate Theses and Dissertations
Department of Sociology Graduate Theses

Items in QSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.


  DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2008  The DSpace Foundation - TOP