QSpace at Queen's University >
Theses, Dissertations & Graduate Projects >
Queen's Theses & Dissertations >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
This item is restricted and will be released 2017-06-25.
|Title: ||J.M. Coetzee and the Limits of Cosmopolitan Feeling|
|Authors: ||Hallemeier, KATHERINE|
|Issue Date: ||26-Jun-2012|
|Series/Report no.: ||Canadian theses|
|Abstract: ||In this dissertation, I argue that accounts of cosmopolitan literature tend to equate cosmopolitanism with sympathetic feeling. I further contend that sympathy is in fact implicitly central to a wider body of contemporary cosmopolitan theory. I distinguish between two strains of cosmopolitan thought that depend upon two distinct models of feeling: “critical cosmopolitanism,” which depends upon a cognitive-evaluative model of sympathy, and “affective cosmopolitanism,” which depends upon a relational model. Both branches of cosmopolitanism envision sympathy as perfectly human or humane; they gloss over the potential for feeling shame in cosmopolitan encounters. The minority of scholarship that does consider shame in relation to cosmopolitan practice also reifies shame as ideally human or humane. Whether through sympathy or shame, cosmopolitan subjects become cosmopolitan through feeling. I offer readings of J.M. Coetzee’s later fiction in order to critique the idealization of feeling as distinctly cosmopolitan. Coetzee’s work, I conclude, suggests another model for cosmopolitanism, one which foregrounds the limits of feeling for realizing mutuality and equality.|
|Description: ||Thesis (Ph.D, English) -- Queen's University, 2012-06-26 10:17:59.252|
|Appears in Collections:||Queen's Theses & Dissertations|
English Literature Graduate Theses
Items in QSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.