Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorShojib, Mahmudul
dc.contributor.otherQueen's University (Kingston, Ont.). Theses (Queen's University (Kingston, Ont.))en
dc.date2015-02-27 11:46:46.183en
dc.date.accessioned2015-03-02T18:33:30Z
dc.date.available2015-03-02T18:33:30Z
dc.date.issued2015-03-02
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1974/12767
dc.descriptionThesis (Master, Civil Engineering) -- Queen's University, 2015-02-27 11:46:46.183en
dc.description.abstractThe dissolution of residual, or trapped, light non-aqueous phase liquid (LNAPL) is an important process that controls, in part, many LNAPL contaminated site remediation. Smear zones can be created in LNAPL source zones by water table fluctuation, trapping both residual LNAPL and gas below the water table to create a three-phase gas-LNAPL-water system. Two sets of laboratory experiments were conducted in this study to investigate the effect of trapped gas on the distribution and dissolution of trapped LNAPL. The first set involved visualization experiments where heptane was spilled in a two-dimensional (2-D) cell. Observations suggested that both heptane and air were trapped during an experiment with a large water table fluctuation, and consisted of singlets, doublets and multi-pore ganglions. Heptane was distributed as very thin films around most of the trapped air, and as discontinuous lenses, most of which were connected to air. The second set of experiments consisted of toluene dissolution experiments in short one dimensional (1-D) columns. Results showed that toluene dissolution was faster in an air-toluene-water system than in a toluene-water system. Toluene concentrations in the three-phase system were high during the early period of the dissolution, and dropped rapidly after 150-250 pore volumes, followed by long tailing concentrations. The increased toluene-water interfacial area associated with toluene films or layers in the three-phase system might be responsible for the observed dissolution behaviour. Toluene concentrations during dissolution from the two-phase system declined more slowly, and were consistently higher than those in the three-phase experiments. Modelling showed that existing two-phase empirical dissolution models, when applied to a three-phase system, over-predict early toluene concentrations, and significantly under-predict the later toluene concentrations and the time required for dissolution. The lumped mass transfer coefficient, based on the best fit of a general power law model, was found to be orders of magnitudes higher for dissolution in the three-phase system than that for the two-phase system. In conclusion, trapped LNAPL dissolution in the presence of trapped gas is substantially different than that which occurs without any gas phase, and predictions of natural attenuation and remediation performance made using two-phase models will be misleading.en_US
dc.languageenen
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCanadian thesesen
dc.rightsThis publication is made available by the authority of the copyright owner solely for the purpose of private study and research and may not be copied or reproduced except as permitted by the copyright laws without written authority from the copyright owner.en
dc.subjectGasen_US
dc.subjectThree-Phaseen_US
dc.subjectLNAPLen_US
dc.subjectDissolutionen_US
dc.titleDissolution of Trapped Light Non-Aqueous Phase Liquid in the Presence of Trapped Gasen_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.description.degreeMasteren
dc.contributor.supervisorMumford, Kevin G.en
dc.contributor.departmentCivil Engineeringen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record