• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Graduate Theses, Dissertations and Projects
    • Queen's Graduate Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Graduate Theses, Dissertations and Projects
    • Queen's Graduate Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    A comparison of three methods of ultrasound to computed tomography registration

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Mackay_Neilson_E_200901_Msc.pdf (4.619Mb)
    Date
    2009-01-22
    Author
    Mackay, Neilson
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    During orthopaedic surgery, preoperative CT scans can be aligned to the patient to assist the guidance of surgical instruments and the placement of implants. Registration (i.e. alignment) can be accomplished in many ways: by registering implanted fiducial markers, by touching a probe to the bone surface, or by aligning intraoperative two dimensional flouro images with the the three dimensional CT data. These approaches have problems: They require exposure of the bone, subject the patient and surgeons to ionizing radiation, or do both. Ultrasound can also be used to register a preoperative CT scan to the patient. The ultrasound probe is tracked as it passes over the patient and the ultrasound images are aligned to the CT data. This method eliminates the problems of bone exposure and ionizing radiation, but is computationally more difficult because the ultrasound images contain incomplete and unclear bone surfaces. In this work, we compare three methods to register a set of ultrasound images to a CT scan: Iterated Closest Point, Mutual Information and a novel method Points-to-Image. The average Target Registration Error and speed of each method is presented along with a brief summary of their strengths and weaknesses.
    URI for this record
    http://hdl.handle.net/1974/1666
    Collections
    • Queen's Graduate Theses and Dissertations
    • School of Computing Graduate Theses
    Request an alternative format
    If you require this document in an alternate, accessible format, please contact the Queen's Adaptive Technology Centre

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of QSpaceCommunities & CollectionsPublished DatesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypesThis CollectionPublished DatesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypes

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage StatisticsView Google Analytics Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV