Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPereira, Marcioen
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-25T21:22:26Z
dc.date.available2018-01-25T21:22:26Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1974/23845
dc.description.abstractThere seems to be a consensus today that representative democracy is facing a period of severe crisis. Contemporary scholars and popular commentators from the most diverse backgrounds and political leanings seem to agree with this diagnosis. Voting, party membership, trust in politicians, and interest in mainstream politics, the most celebrated indicators of political scientists to measure representative democracy’s “health,” are all under great stress in several countries. However, a closer look at the history of what we today call “representative democracy” would reveal that the current crisis (although perhaps one of the most severe) is not really original. On the contrary, representative politics has been time and again plagued by the explosion of crisis. To address this vexing question, this dissertation adopts the following strategy. Initially, it situates its analysis within the context of the American Revolution. Since the American Revolution represents one of the most important events for the emergence of the project of “representative democracy,” the examination of aspects of this episode can provide insight for understanding the frequent crises of representative politics more generally. In addition, this dissertation examines the dispute over the concept of constituent power (and democracy) that erupted throughout the American Revolution between the Federalists and the dissident strands of the Revolution. The investigation of this dispute has two main goals. The first is to present an alternative path for the dominant view on constituent power (and democracy). The second is to provide insights for the reflections on the limits of representative democracy. On this latter point, I argue that the alternative perspective of constituent power can function as a potent tool to address the recurrent crisis of democracy.en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCanadian thesesen
dc.rightsCC0 1.0 Universalen
dc.rightsQueen's University's Thesis/Dissertation Non-Exclusive License for Deposit to QSpace and Library and Archives Canadaen
dc.rightsProQuest PhD and Master's Theses International Dissemination Agreementen
dc.rightsIntellectual Property Guidelines at Queen's Universityen
dc.rightsCopying and Preserving Your Thesisen
dc.rightsThis publication is made available by the authority of the copyright owner solely for the purpose of private study and research and may not be copied or reproduced except as permitted by the copyright laws without written authority from the copyright owner.en
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
dc.subjectConstituent Power. Democracy. American Revolution. Federalists. Pennsylvania.en
dc.titleIn Praise of Rebellion: Constituent Power, Democracy, and the American Revolutionen
dc.typethesisen
dc.description.degreePhDen
dc.contributor.supervisorEssert, Christopheren
dc.contributor.supervisorSantiago, Homeroen
dc.contributor.departmentLawen
dc.embargo.termsI will try to publish my thesis commercially. I believe that unrestricted QSpace publishing may decrease my chances of being published commercially.en
dc.embargo.liftdate2019-03-07
dc.degree.grantorQueen's University at Kingstonen


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

CC0 1.0 Universal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as CC0 1.0 Universal