Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSweet, Shane N.en
dc.contributor.authorMichalovic, Emilieen
dc.contributor.authorLatimer-Cheung, Amy E.en
dc.contributor.authorFortier, Michelleen
dc.contributor.authorNoreau, Lucen
dc.contributor.authorZelaya, Walteren
dc.contributor.authorMartin Ginis, Kathleen A.en
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-06T18:19:30Z
dc.date.available2019-06-06T18:19:30Z
dc.date.issued2018-03-01
dc.identifier.citationSweet, S. N., Michalovic, E., Latimer-Cheung, A. E., Fortier, M., Noreau, L., Zelaya, W., & Martin Ginis, K. A. (2018). Spinal Cord Injury Peer Mentorship: Applying Self-Determination Theory to Explain Quality of Life and Participation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 99(3), 468–476.e12. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2017.08.487en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1974/26279
dc.descriptionThe final publication is available at Elsevier via http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2017.08.487 ©2018. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en
dc.description.abstractObjectives To investigate the role of spinal cord injury (SCI) peer mentorship on quality of life (QoL)/participation, and test a self-determination theory model that explains the role of SCI peer mentorship on these outcomes. Design A static group comparison design. Setting Community. Participants A convenience sample of mentees (individuals receiving peer mentorship) (n=68) and nonmentees (n=63) who had an SCI, were older than 18 years, and spoke either English or French. Interventions Mentees: at least 4 peer mentorship sessions over the past 5 years; nonpeer mentees: 0 or 1 brief introductory session. Main Outcome Measures QoL (ie, life satisfaction and positive and negative affect), participation (eg, autonomous indoor; family role), and the psychological needs of autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Results No group differences were found, but years since injury was a moderator indicating that, generally, peer mentees living with SCI for longer (∼30y) appear to benefit more from peer mentorship interactions compared with nonmentees and mentees living with SCI for approximately 6 years. Competence and relatedness mediated the peer mentorship–outcome relationship for QoL and some participation variables, indicating that peer mentorship predicted competence and relatedness, which in turn were related to the outcomes. Conclusions Satisfaction of competence and relatedness needs requires greater attention in SCI peer mentorship. Years since injury modified the relationship between peer mentorship and outcomes, which provided new insights on the role of SCI peer mentorship. Further studies are needed to determine SCI peer mentorship–specific outcomes that are important across the years-since-injury spectrum.en
dc.publisherElsevier BVen
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectMentorsen
dc.subjectPsychological theoryen
dc.subjectQuality of lifeen
dc.subjectRehabilitationen
dc.subjectSocial participationen
dc.subjectSpinal cord injuriesen
dc.titleSpinal Cord Injury Peer Mentorship: Applying Self-Determination Theory to Explain Quality of Life and Participationen
dc.typejournal articleen
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2017.08.487


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/