Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNguyen, Andrewen
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-06T22:34:26Z
dc.date.available2021-07-06T22:34:26Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1974/28945
dc.description.abstractStealing Thunder is a phenomenon where transgressors reveal potentially damaging information about their transgressions before its details can be revealed by a third party. Much research has been done on the Stealing Thunder phenomenon, with the majority having been focused on establishing the existence of the effect and the potential moderating factors that influence the efficacy of the tactic. A review of the literature reveals it to be somewhat lacking in several regards. First, the breadth and depth of research on the moderators and features of stealing thunder have been quite limited. Second, the interpretability of existing research is often difficult because of methodological ambiguities. The present document describes two programs of research designed to address some of the breadth and methodological issues present in the existing literature. The first program of research investigated the potential influence of a previously unexamined feature of stealing thunder, confession specificity. Across four studies, results showed that stealing thunder confessions were more effective when they contained specific details regarding the transgression than when they contained comparatively vague details. Additionally, the evidence suggests that previously-assumed interchangeable dependent variables should not be used interchangeably, and stealing thunder exerts a stronger effect on measures of honesty than on measures of global evaluation because honesty is a more proximal outcome of stealing thunder than is global evaluation. The second program of research investigated the influence of elaboration on stealing thunder across two studies. However, because not all manipulations in this second program of research were effective, it was not possible to fully evaluate the critical hypotheses. Nonetheless, this second set of studies might provide building blocks towards improved studies that might provide a more satisfying answer to the research question. Overall, results across two programs of research not only extended the iii stealing thunder literature, but also contributed to a broader understanding of stealing thunder mechanisms as well as the comparative effectiveness of stealing thunder on shaping judgments of different dimensions of person perception.en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCanadian thesesen
dc.rightsQueen's University's Thesis/Dissertation Non-Exclusive License for Deposit to QSpace and Library and Archives Canadaen
dc.rightsProQuest PhD and Master's Theses International Dissemination Agreementen
dc.rightsIntellectual Property Guidelines at Queen's Universityen
dc.rightsCopying and Preserving Your Thesisen
dc.rightsThis publication is made available by the authority of the copyright owner solely for the purpose of private study and research and may not be copied or reproduced except as permitted by the copyright laws without written authority from the copyright owner.en
dc.rightsCC0 1.0 Universal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/*
dc.subjectstealing thunderen
dc.subjectimpression managementen
dc.subjectconfessionsen
dc.subjectsocial influenceen
dc.titleSTEALING THUNDER: THE INFLUENCE OF SPECIFICITY, ELABORATION, AND ARGUMENT QUALITYen
dc.typethesisen
dc.description.degreePhDen
dc.contributor.supervisorFabrigar, Leandre
dc.contributor.departmentPsychologyen
dc.degree.grantorQueen's University at Kingstonen


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Queen's University's Thesis/Dissertation Non-Exclusive License for Deposit to QSpace and Library and Archives Canada
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Queen's University's Thesis/Dissertation Non-Exclusive License for Deposit to QSpace and Library and Archives Canada