• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Graduate Theses, Dissertations and Projects
    • Queen's Graduate Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Graduate Theses, Dissertations and Projects
    • Queen's Graduate Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Toward a Substantive Right of Exit

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Mertel_Kurt_CM_200709_MA.pdf (552.4Kb)
    Date
    2007-09-25
    Author
    Mertel, Kurt Cihan Murat
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    This paper deals with an important problem in contemporary political thought: the

    problem of ‘minorities within minorities’. The problem lies in the fact that, on one hand, while

    illiberal cultural or religious groups may seek to impose internal restrictions on their members

    which violate their basic rights as citizens - in the name of the freedom of religion/conscience,

    and/or cultural preservation – the state has a responsibility to protect the members of such groups

    from harm. On the other hand, the state would be overstepping the boundaries of legitimate

    authority - ignoring the freedom of association and conscience - if it intervened in the affairs of

    such groups to forcibly change their internal structure to cohere with liberal values.

    The necessity of a right to exit one’s inherited religious or cultural community has been

    widely acknowledged by philosophers as a solution to the problem of internal minorities, in that,

    it is seen both as a means to protect individuals from oppressive cultural and religious practices,

    as well as, establishing the necessary threshold groups must meet in order to be immune from

    state intervention. But while there may be a broad consensus on the necessity of the right of exit,

    there is significant disagreement over the specific content of a right: some philosophers support a

    ‘minimalist’ or formal conception while others endorse a more substantive formulation, which

    involves supplementation with other negative and positive rights.

    The aim of this paper is to provide an outline of a substantive right of exit. The

    conception I defend involves the provision of an array of negative and positive rights and is based

    on a consistent and unequivocal commitment to autonomy, manifested in its most important

    element: the provision of a liberal (multicultural) education for minimal autonomy. The upshot of

    the education requirement for my conception of the right of exit is that it possesses considerable

    transformative power in addition to an enhanced protective role. The distinctiveness of my

    account revolves around its emphasis on the transformative function of exit, which seeks to

    address the underlying problem by focusing on the long-term challenge of 'liberalizing' cultures.
    URI for this record
    http://hdl.handle.net/1974/702
    Collections
    • Queen's Graduate Theses and Dissertations
    • Department of Philosophy Graduate Theses
    Request an alternative format
    If you require this document in an alternate, accessible format, please contact the Queen's Adaptive Technology Centre

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of QSpaceCommunities & CollectionsPublished DatesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypesThis CollectionPublished DatesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypes

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage StatisticsView Google Analytics Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV