Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKnott, T. Christineen
dc.date2013-06-27 12:24:53.085
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-27T16:49:38Z
dc.date.available2016-07-03T08:00:05Z
dc.date.issued2013-06-27
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1974/8092
dc.descriptionThesis (Ph.D, Rehabilitation Science) -- Queen's University, 2013-06-27 12:24:53.085en
dc.description.abstractThere is compelling evidence for the effectiveness of home-based occupational therapy and physiotherapy rehabilitation for community dwelling elderly who may struggle with basic activities and the functions of daily living and mobility. Nonetheless, an estimated 2% of home care’s elderly clients receive these therapies. Ontario’s home care data indicates that 78% of clients that could benefit from these specific therapies are not receiving them. The study examined a subset of elderly clients receiving home care following a hospital discharge during 2009-2010. The aim of this study was to: understand the difference between those home care clients who received occupational therapy or physiotherapy and those who did not; and determine if receiving these therapies impacted the utilization of hospital emergency departments and inpatient admissions. A retrospective cohort design and multivariate and survival analysis of hospital and home care administrative data structured the study. Results suggest that home-based rehabilitation is offered to a minority of the home care population. Distinct client characteristics and process variables significantly associated with the increased likelihood of receiving home-based occupational and physical therapies included: clients who were older, females, admitted to home care from hospital inpatient units, assessed as non-acute for clinical and service needs and required more home making support and assistance with activities of daily living. Almost one quarter of the total sample returned to hospital. Visits to emergency departments accounted for the greater part of hospital utilization and primarily for sub-acute general symptoms and signs, post-procedural complications, infections or acute episodes from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and renal failure. Slightly over half of the clients returning to hospital did not receive home-based rehabilitation. Clients who received occupational therapy returned to the hospital sooner following their home care admission whereas clients receiving physiotherapy spent the longest time before rehospitalizing. The majority of the clients receiving occupational therapy were admitted to home care having just resolved sub-acute conditions or symptoms, many of which are known to influence functional and physical decline. Moreover, analysis of process variables indicated that the wait time for a referral to occupational therapy was two times longer compared to physiotherapy. These same clients also waited, on average, over one month before an occupational therapist’s first visit. The need to discriminate who receives home-based rehabilitation is essential to understanding how specific therapies contribute to improving systems outcomes. This study is the first examination that focuses specifically on home-based occupational therapy and physiotherapy rehabilitation and the client characteristics and process variables associated with receiving/not receiving these therapies and the impact these factors have on the time-to-rehospitalization.en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCanadian thesesen
dc.rightsThis publication is made available by the authority of the copyright owner solely for the purpose of private study and research and may not be copied or reproduced except as permitted by the copyright laws without written authority from the copyright owner.en
dc.subjectHome-Based Rehabilitationen
dc.subjectOccupational Therapyen
dc.subjectPhysiotherapyen
dc.subjectHome Careen
dc.subjectTime-to-Rehospitalizationen
dc.subjectSurvival Analysisen
dc.subjectElderlyen
dc.subjectOntario's Community Care Access Centreen
dc.subjectHospital Utilizationen
dc.titleHome-Based Rehabilitation and its Impact on Hospital Utilizationen
dc.typethesisen
dc.description.restricted-thesisRequesting restriction for the following reasons: 1) Pending publications; and 2) Results are in the process of being shared with health service agencies that provided data for the study.en
dc.description.degreePhDen
dc.contributor.supervisorMcColl, Mary Annen
dc.contributor.departmentRehabilitation Scienceen
dc.embargo.terms1825en
dc.degree.grantorQueen's University at Kingstonen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record