Beta EEG as a Correlate of Belief-Reasoning in Preschoolers

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Payumo, Mark

Date

2025-09-09

Type

thesis

Language

eng

Keyword

Theory of Mind , EEG , Developmental Neuroscience

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Alternative Title

Abstract

Reasoning about beliefs is difficult, especially when others hold beliefs that conflict with one’s own. A milestone in Theory of Mind development is understanding false beliefs: the realization that others may hold representations of the world that differ from one’s own perspective (Wellman & Cross, 2001). The False Belief (FB) task has traditionally assessed this understanding by requiring children to judge a protagonist’s outdated belief about an object’s location (Wimmer & Perner, 1983). While behavioural improvements in FB performance are well-documented across preschool years, the neurocognitive mechanisms supporting successful belief-reasoning remain unclear. This dissertation investigates the role of beta (13–30 Hz) EEG activity in children’s belief-reasoning through its association with cognitive maintenance and updating (Engel & Fries, 2010; Kilavik et al., 2013). Study 1 examined beta in preschoolers (ages 3–6, n = 39) as they completed a FB task. We focused on comparing children who passed versus failed the FB task to identify distinct neural processes underlying success and failure in belief-reasoning. During the location-change event, when belief representations are formed within the task, failers exhibited beta suppression over the posterior parietal cortex, consistent with belief updating. In contrast, passers showed evidence of beta enhancement, suggesting cognitive maintenance. These results imply that failers misrepresent the protagonist’s belief as aligned with reality. Study 2 replicated these findings in a new sample (n = 35), where beta suppression again characterized failers and enhancement characterized passers. This study also introduced an Ignorant FB task, where children lack knowledge of the object’s new location. This condition revealed no group differences in beta; however, failers showed greater beta enhancement over the right temporo-parietal region compared to the Standard FB. This suggests they distinguished between knowledge conditions neurally, even without improved behavioural performance. Together, these studies reveal that beta oscillatory dynamics can distinguish cognitive processes of maintenance and updating during belief-reasoning. Based on distinct beta patterns between groups, our findings suggest that failures in FB reasoning may reflect conceptual limitations in belief representation. These results contribute to theoretical accounts of ToM development, highlighting the interplay of behavioural and neural changes in belief-reasoning across the preschool years.

Description

Citation

Publisher

License

Queen's University's Thesis/Dissertation Non-Exclusive License for Deposit to QSpace and Library and Archives Canada
Intellectual Property Guidelines at Queen's University
Copying and Preserving Your Thesis
This publication is made available by the authority of the copyright owner solely for the purpose of private study and research and may not be copied or reproduced except as permitted by the copyright laws without written authority from the copyright owner.

Journal

Volume

Issue

PubMed ID

External DOI

ISSN

EISSN