Institutional Feedback and Coalition Politics: The Case of School Choice Policies in Advanced Democracies

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Lachance, Anne

Date

Type

thesis

Language

eng

Keyword

Comparative Politcs , Comparative Education Policy , Education , Historical Institutionalism , Coalition Analysis , Sweden , France , United States

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Alternative Title

Abstract

This dissertation seeks to identify the political forces that have driven the shift towards school choice in advanced democracies and to explain the variation in policy outcomes observable in these countries. To do so, it examines reforms introduced between 1985 and 2017 in France, Sweden, and Wisconsin, which all moved towards school choice, albeit with varying levels of enthusiasm and immediacy. The main argument defended in this dissertation is that the policy outcomes in each country are the result of the interaction of institutional dynamics and coalition politics. Two institutional dynamics were important in the politics of school choice: institutional feedback effects, which shaped the contestants in each political battle and veto points, which slowed the pace of change. This analysis especially emphasizes the role of negative feedback effects in each country. Educational institutions in Sweden, France, and Wisconsin stimulated a different set of group grievances. Actors who saw themselves as disadvantaged had incentives to call for reform and collaborate with other actors who had similar goals. In other words, negative feedback effects created a different pattern of grievances that political actors mobilized. In all three countries, the strength and stringency of veto points influenced the pace of change. These institutional dynamics interacted with coalition politics. Political parties in particular but also civil society organizations articulated the grievances of the groups angered by education policy. The policy coalitions they built varied in size, duration, and in the type of social interests they incorporated. School choice proponents in Sweden built the strongest and most stable coalition. The American coalition was narrower and incorporated strange bedfellows: religious groups, market conservatives, and African American activists. Finally, French policymakers could not build a coalition that was strong or stable enough to implement their policy agenda. The composition of policy coalitions influenced the outcome of the reform process. In Sweden, the change was deep and universal, while it was shallow and targeted to particular groups in France. In Wisconsin, both shallow-universal and deep-targeted changes were introduced. In combination, the institutional dynamics and coalition politics explain the patterns of educational policy change across these three countries.

Description

Citation

Publisher

License

Queen's University's Thesis/Dissertation Non-Exclusive License for Deposit to QSpace and Library and Archives Canada
ProQuest PhD and Master's Theses International Dissemination Agreement
Intellectual Property Guidelines at Queen's University
Copying and Preserving Your Thesis
This publication is made available by the authority of the copyright owner solely for the purpose of private study and research and may not be copied or reproduced except as permitted by the copyright laws without written authority from the copyright owner.

Journal

Volume

Issue

PubMed ID

External DOI

ISSN

EISSN