Investigating the Role of Working Memory on Emotion Recognition Accuracy in Emerging Adults

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Nault, Peyton

Date

2024-09-05

Type

thesis

Language

eng

Keyword

Emotion recognition , Working memory capacity , Attentional control , Modality differences , Temporality differences

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Alternative Title

Abstract

Emotion recognition involves interpreting nonverbal cues like facial expressions and tone of voice. Vocal emotion recognition is more challenging and matures later than facial recognition. However, research often uses static facial expressions and dynamic vocal expressions, leading to biased comparisons. The disparity between vocal and facial emotion recognition may stem from the need for advanced cognitive skills to interpret dynamic expressions that unfold over time. The current online study explored potential cognitive predictors involved in four emotion recognition tasks in a sample of 260 emerging adults (60.4% female; age M = 22.24 years, SD = 7.50 years). Including four emotion recognition tasks (i.e., static voice, static face, dynamic voice, and dynamic face) in the current study enabled direct comparisons between facial and vocal modalities, addressing the temporal inconsistencies found in previous research. Additionally, tasks such as the backwards digit span and N-back were used to assess whether different facets of working memory predicted emotion recognition accuracy. It was hypothesized that emotion recognition accuracy would be higher for facial compared to vocal stimuli, with the lowest accuracy expected in the dynamic vocal condition. Additionally, it was hypothesized that working memory would be a predictor of emotion recognition accuracy for dynamic stimuli. Results of the study show that emotion recognition accuracy was higher for facial compared to vocal stimuli, and that emotion recognition accuracy was higher for static compared to dynamic stimuli. The impact of modality on emotion recognition accuracy depended on whether the stimuli were static or dynamic. Dynamic facial expressions were recognized more accurately than vocal prosody, whereas static vocalizations and static facial images were recognized with similar accuracy. Although working memory did not predict overall emotion recognition accuracy, the results changed when the challenging dynamic vocal condition was excluded. Without this condition, visual working memory was associated with higher emotion recognition accuracy. Furthermore, attentional control also predicted greater accuracy, contributing uniquely beyond the influence of visual working memory. These findings provide insight into the cognitive processes involved in emotion recognition and have implications for understanding the varying developmental trajectories of facial compared to vocal emotion recognition.

Description

Citation

Publisher

License

Queen's University's Thesis/Dissertation Non-Exclusive License for Deposit to QSpace and Library and Archives Canada
ProQuest PhD and Master's Theses International Dissemination Agreement
Intellectual Property Guidelines at Queen's University
Copying and Preserving Your Thesis
This publication is made available by the authority of the copyright owner solely for the purpose of private study and research and may not be copied or reproduced except as permitted by the copyright laws without written authority from the copyright owner.
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

Journal

Volume

Issue

PubMed ID

External DOI

ISSN

EISSN