Iris Murdoch's Philosophical Methodology, 1950–1961: Philosophy on the Borders of Literature and Politics

dc.contributor.authorJamieson, Lesleyen
dc.contributor.departmentPhilosophyen
dc.contributor.supervisorBakhurst, David
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-04T17:26:32Z
dc.date.available2021-08-04T17:26:32Z
dc.degree.grantorQueen's University at Kingstonen
dc.description.abstractIn this dissertation I argue that Iris Murdoch’s 1950 to 1961 writings exemplify a distinctive philosophical methodology characterized by literary and metaphysical argumentative strategies, public audience, and practical (moral, political, and cultural) aims. Important features of this methodology are only visible when we read her early essays in their historical context, i.e., as responses to dominant philosophical outlooks like behaviourism and prescriptivism and to wider political and cultural trends that she identifies such as the decline of visionary socialist theory and the waning of interest in socialism in postwar Britain. I defend a periodization of her bibliography, treating her writings from the first decade of her career as a standalone period unified by a set of practical concerns rather than, e.g., a preliminary stage of an evolutionary narrative. Furthermore, rather than treating her distinctive use of metaphors, analogies, and other literary techniques as ancillary to her philosophical methods, I investigate how these techniques contribute to her overall argumentative strategy. After defending these decisions, I identify the methods and aims that recur throughout Murdoch’s writings on mind, aesthetics, morals, and politics. First, I argue that her writings pay naïve attention to familiar human practices to disclose the conceptual shortcomings of dominant philosophical outlooks, including behaviourism, Kantian aesthetics, existentialism, and prescriptivism. Second, I argue that she supplements these conceptual deprivations by introducing imagery that represents the metaphysical background and ideals of our practices as well as the barriers that make them difficult for us to achieve. Finally, I argue that Murdoch views these practices as mutable rather than as necessary features of human life and that she in fact worries about their continued health in postwar Britain. A unique vision of philosophy emerges from this analysis. I reveal its strengths by comparing it to Alice Crary’s argumentative strategies in Inside Ethics (2016) and thereby demonstrate that it provides us with an illuminating critical perspective from which to question how contemporary philosophers conceive of the audience and aims of metaphysics and public philosophy.en
dc.description.degreePhDen
dc.embargo.liftdate2026-08-03T16:58:02Z
dc.embargo.termsI intend to pursue publication for my dissertation, which would be impeded if it were publically available. I would like to restrict access to my thesis.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1974/28988
dc.language.isoengen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCanadian thesesen
dc.rightsQueen's University's Thesis/Dissertation Non-Exclusive License for Deposit to QSpace and Library and Archives Canadaen
dc.rightsProQuest PhD and Master's Theses International Dissemination Agreementen
dc.rightsIntellectual Property Guidelines at Queen's Universityen
dc.rightsCopying and Preserving Your Thesisen
dc.rightsThis publication is made available by the authority of the copyright owner solely for the purpose of private study and research and may not be copied or reproduced except as permitted by the copyright laws without written authority from the copyright owner.en
dc.subjectphilosophyen
dc.subjectaestheticsen
dc.subjectphilosophy of minden
dc.subjecthistory of philosophyen
dc.subjectphilosophical methodologyen
dc.subjectmoral psychologyen
dc.subjectmetaphysicsen
dc.subjectthe new leften
dc.titleIris Murdoch's Philosophical Methodology, 1950–1961: Philosophy on the Borders of Literature and Politicsen
dc.typethesisen
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Jamieson_Lesley_P_202108_PhD.pdf
Size:
1.31 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Thesis Document
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.25 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: