Could Community Contribution Companies Improve Access to Justice?
Loading...
Authors
Henderson, Gail E.
Date
2016
Type
journal article
Language
en
Keyword
Alternative Title
Abstract
The legal profession is engaged in two related debates: how to improve access to justice and whether to liberalize its rules of professional conduct to permit “alternative business structures” and non-lawyer ownership. The purpose of this article is to inform readers about the “community contribution company,” or C3—a new type of hybrid corporation introduced in British Columbia—and to examine the potential of C3s or similar corporate forms to respond to both of these challenges. A C3 is a for-profit entity, but profits are subordinated to the company’s chosen “community purpose.” In the UK, where alternative business structures and non-lawyer ownership are permitted, a similar type of corporation has been used to provide both low-cost legal services and as a potential source of funding to free legal clinics. Canadian provincial law societies could use C3s to test alternative business structures and non-lawyer ownership through a corporate structure that addresses some of the concerns typically raised in this debate.
Description
Citation
Henderson, Gail E. "Could Community Contribution Companies Improve Access to Justice?" (2016). 94 Canadian Bar Review 2. 209-240
Publisher
Canadian Bar Association
License
Journal
Volume
Issue
URI for this record
PubMed ID
External DOI
ISSN
0008-3003