THE IMPACT OF CORRELATIONS IN CONSOLIDATING STANDARDIZED ROBOTIC TASKS INTO A GLOBAL PERFORMANCE SCORE

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Fleury, Colleen

Date

Type

thesis

Language

eng

Keyword

Kinarm , Correlations , Monte Carlo , Neuroscience , primary outcome

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Alternative Title

Abstract

Neurological diseases and disorders that impact the brain contribute a considerable amount to global burden of disease. Informative assessment is needed to guide treatment and identify novel interventions. However, clinically used neurological scales are coarse and commonly have floor and ceiling effects, impacting their suitability for clinical trials. Kinematic-based measures using technologies such as interactive robots possess the fine resolution to detect improvements in motor function and may prove useful to quantify the potential benefits of novel therapeutic interventions. Our lab has developed over a dozen robot based behavioral tasks to quantify sensory, motor, and cognitive function associated with the arm. Detailed spatiotemporal measures are combined to provide a single measure of performance in the task, called a Task Score. The challenge is to combine these Task Scores into a single measure suitable for use in clinical trials. The present thesis explores how Tasks Scores can be combined to create a single measure of overall performance, called the Kinarm Score. While a simple summation of Tasks Scores could be used, the presence of correlations across behaviours may impact the ability to identify impairments. Notably, the use of actual healthy participant data to compute these correlations would require all participants to complete all robot-based tasks whenever a new task is developed. Thus, the addition of one new task requires hundreds of individuals to be assessed. First, simulations were used to quantify how correlations across Tasks Scores would impact a global Kinarm score. We found that with a moderate correlation of 0.6, the number of individuals classified as impaired was 6.86% (± 0.55%), rather than the expected level of 5%. Importantly, each additional task increased this error such that 9 tasks increased the percentage of impaired individuals to 15.5% (± 1.02%), more than 3 times the expected level. Next, techniques were developed to incorporate correlations into a simulated dataset. The inclusion of inter-task correlations improved model performance by identifying only 6.7% of individuals as impaired in contrast to the 10% if correlations were not considered in the simulated dataset (5% is expected).

Description

Citation

Publisher

License

Queen's University's Thesis/Dissertation Non-Exclusive License for Deposit to QSpace and Library and Archives Canada
ProQuest PhD and Master's Theses International Dissemination Agreement
Intellectual Property Guidelines at Queen's University
Copying and Preserving Your Thesis
This publication is made available by the authority of the copyright owner solely for the purpose of private study and research and may not be copied or reproduced except as permitted by the copyright laws without written authority from the copyright owner.

Journal

Volume

Issue

PubMed ID

External DOI

ISSN

EISSN