Suspected Endometriosis: A Critical Scoping Review of Medical Literature

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Cameron, Elizabeth S.

Date

2024-07-15

Type

thesis

Language

eng

Keyword

endometriosis , sociology , medicine , disability , critical health studies , literature review , diagnosis , chronic illness , pathology , feminist science and technology studies , suspected endometriosis , queer theory

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Alternative Title

Abstract

Endometriosis is a chronic, progressive, inflammatory pain disease that affects at least 10 percent of women and unknown numbers of gender-diverse people globally. Presently, those with endometriosis symptoms wait an average of four to twelve years to receive a surgical diagnosis, as currently, this is the only way to confirm the disease’s presence. Clinical endometriosis diagnosis – when a physician suspects someone has the disease based on non-surgical evaluations – is increasingly encouraged in Western capitalist medical systems in order to reduce diagnostic delay, and circumvent problems arising from the reliance on a surgical diagnostic method, which is invasive and can be sterilizing. However, people with suspected endometriosis – those who have not had this diagnosis confirmed through surgery – are yet to be considered as a population with unique care needs, experiences, or desires. This is the first academic contribution in the social sciences to consider suspected endometriosis in particular. First, I conduct a scoping review of suspected endometriosis within medical literature. I then reframe this medical literature through a critical intersectional body studies perspective, finding that a lack of biomedical knowledge and care concerning those with suspected endometriosis produces racialized, gendered diagnostic outcomes which serve white supremacist and patriarchal projects of ableism and cisheteronormativity. Next, I consider the future ‘gold standard’ of endometriosis treatment, identifying a clinical turn presently underway within the endometriosis paradigm which places increasing reliance on clinical, rather than surgical, diagnostic methods and treatments. Ultimately, this research disidentifies suspected endometriosis with its biomedical construction, and argues expanded critical intersectional research is urgently needed in order to develop more relevant, accessible, and effective care for those affected with suspected endometriosis.

Description

Citation

Publisher

License

Queen's University's Thesis/Dissertation Non-Exclusive License for Deposit to QSpace and Library and Archives Canada
ProQuest PhD and Master's Theses International Dissemination Agreement
Intellectual Property Guidelines at Queen's University
Copying and Preserving Your Thesis
This publication is made available by the authority of the copyright owner solely for the purpose of private study and research and may not be copied or reproduced except as permitted by the copyright laws without written authority from the copyright owner.

Journal

Volume

Issue

PubMed ID

External DOI

ISSN

EISSN