Relationships and the Limits of Reasonable Partiality
Loading...
Authors
Ritcey, Nolan S.
Date
2015-01-09
Type
thesis
Language
eng
Keyword
action theory , ethics , non-reductionism , special obligations , moral philosophy , partiality , practical reason , relationships
Alternative Title
Abstract
The problems associated with an overly impartial moral psychology are well discussed
in the literature on utilitarianism, consequentialism, and rational decision moral theory.
Criticisms of these approaches to morality center on how they invite us to think
in terms which alienate us from those things which matter to us most, our friends
and family, our special projects, and our personal integrity. To the extent that these
criticisms are successful, they recommend viewing morality and moral reasoning in
the context of personal concerns. This inquiry is an investigation into how to understand
the reasons of partiality as genuine reasons, and to determine, broadly, how to
understand reasonable partiality.
The account presented here has descriptive and normative elements. It is descriptive
of the grounds of special responsibilities and the restrictions on what relationships
are capable to support special responsibilities. It is normative insofar as it answers
questions regarding what relationships should support special responsibilities and
what significance they should have in comparison to other important considerations.
The primary focus is on how relationships do, and should, modify a moral agent’s
practical outlook. The practical relevance of relationships is modeled on a theory of
joint action, which sets out how joint actions modify an individual’s practical outlook
by making certain considerations necessarily salient.
The resulting position is primarily deflationary with regard to the conflict between
morality, on the one hand, and partiality on the other. The joint action presentation
reveals that relationships do not need to conflict with morality, but can, and should,
incorporate moral principles into the central aims and action sequences which are their
mainstays. Reasonable partiality is simply the form of reasoning that adequately recognizes the joint enterprises that compose a person’s relationship. Accordingly,
controversial acts of reasonable partiality, such as transfers of wealth, are categorized
as substantive positions within a theory of what counts as adequate recognition, not
necessary to all partiality
Description
Thesis (Ph.D, Philosophy) -- Queen's University, 2015-01-09 09:35:20.116
Citation
Publisher
License
This publication is made available by the authority of the copyright owner solely for the purpose of private study and research and may not be copied or reproduced except as permitted by the copyright laws without written authority from the copyright owner.