Understanding the Barriers and Facilitators for Healthcare Professionals to Adopt the ‘Living With Risk: Decision Support Approach’ Into the Hospital and Community Settings

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

MacLeod, Heather

Date

2025-08-26

Type

thesis

Language

eng

Keyword

Risk Assessment and Management , Older adults living with frailty , Safety concerns , Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research , Barriers and Facilitators , Clinician facing decision support tool , Shared decision making , Adopting innovations in hospital and community settings

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Alternative Title

Abstract

Health care professionals (HCPs) tend to overprotect older adults when there are safety concerns and over focus on the potential negative and physical consequences. HCPs should instead be engaging older adults in a balanced, broadened and strength-based approach to risk assessment and management. This approach leverages older adults’ strengths and considers the negative and positive emotional, social and physical consequences of perceived risky decisions. The Living with Risk: Decision Support Approach (LwR:DSA) incorporates and operationalizes these elements and its use has led to improved communication, clinical thinking, decision making and efficiencies in the care process. Yet little is known on how best to adopt the LwR:DSA into hospital and community settings. To address this evidence gap, this study aimed to identify, describe and understand the characteristics of the client, practice setting, HCP, LwR:DSA, and implementation process that facilitated or inhibited the adoption of the LwR:DSA in these two practice settings. The second aim was to optimize future adoption of the approach by improving the LwR:DSA and the four pre-selected implementation strategies (training videos, instruction guide, worksheets, and bi-monthly emails) and develop new implementation strategies based on the findings of the first aim. A concurrent multimethods study was used to answer these questions by gathering qualitative and quantitative data pre-, during and post-use of the LwR:DSA for eight weeks. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR 1.0) was chosen as the theoretical framework to guide data collection, data analysis and development of the implementation strategies. Findings revealed that 80% of the participants (20/25) adopted the LwR:DSA at least once over an eight-week period with consistent use of all implementation strategies. The participants identified 17 anticipated and 20 actual determinants of adoption across all five CFIR domains, with the majority being facilitators. While the four implementation strategies were helpful for initial adoption they were not sufficient for continued use as 70% of the participants indicated that they could have used the LwR:DSA more. The anticipated and actual determinants were then used to tailor the existing implementation strategies and provide suggestions for future strategies to support full implementation and sustainability of the LwR:DSA.

Description

Citation

Publisher

License

Queen's University's Thesis/Dissertation Non-Exclusive License for Deposit to QSpace and Library and Archives Canada
Intellectual Property Guidelines at Queen's University
Copying and Preserving Your Thesis
This publication is made available by the authority of the copyright owner solely for the purpose of private study and research and may not be copied or reproduced except as permitted by the copyright laws without written authority from the copyright owner.
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

Journal

Volume

Issue

PubMed ID

External DOI

ISSN

EISSN