THE MAKING OF MINORITY POLICIES IN NATIONALIZING STATES: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ESTONIA AND ISRAEL

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Talal, Olga

Date

Type

thesis

Language

eng

Keyword

Ethnic Minorities , Israel , Estonia , Nationalizing States , Comparative Politics

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Alternative Title

Abstract

Why do nationalizing states, committed to preferential treatment of the dominant nation within the state, vary in their treatment of ethnic minorities? Why do some nationalizing states choose to simultaneously provide a certain degree of accommodation to their ethnic minorities in some realms while excluding them from others? Under which conditions will these states decide to shift their policy, and why? The fact that ethnic minorities experience inconsistent state treatment across time and policy issues warrants a theoretical explanation. Presently, we know comparatively little about the drivers of policy change in nationalizing states, and the reasons behind the adoption of inconsistent policies, especially where they are detrimental to the objectives of the nationalizing political elites. This dissertation develops a theoretical framework to explain diachronic and across policy variation toward minorities in states committed to a nationalizing agenda. The main argument of this dissertation is that fragmentation of political authority can lead to varying policy outcomes toward ethnic minorities in nationalizing states. At high levels of political authority that is concentrated in the executive branch, elected officials adopt policies in accordance with their political preferences and have the oversight capacity to determine adequate policy outcomes. In this case, nationalist governments are likely to adopt exclusionary policies, and minority-friendly ones, more accommodating policies. When political authority is fragmented, additional actors become endowed with policymaking authority. Fragmentation resulting from delegation of authority to the bureaucracy creates opportunities for entrepreneurial and savvy bureaucrats to initiate policy diversion from the status quo policy on minority issues. The extent to which bureaucrats are entrepreneurial and the particular characteristics of their policymaking behaviour explain why nationalizing states, at times, employ incoherent and inconsistent policies in relation to their minorities, especially in the absence of alternation of the governing incumbents. A process-tracing analysis of the policy process in Israel and Estonia toward the Palestinian Arab and Russian-speaking minorities, respectively, is used to develop the theoretical framework of this dissertation.

Description

Citation

Publisher

License

Queen's University's Thesis/Dissertation Non-Exclusive License for Deposit to QSpace and Library and Archives Canada
ProQuest PhD and Master's Theses International Dissemination Agreement
Intellectual Property Guidelines at Queen's University
Copying and Preserving Your Thesis
This publication is made available by the authority of the copyright owner solely for the purpose of private study and research and may not be copied or reproduced except as permitted by the copyright laws without written authority from the copyright owner.

Journal

Volume

Issue

PubMed ID

External DOI

ISSN

EISSN