Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorQuaid, Jenniferen
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-29T23:32:56Z
dc.date.available2016-11-29T23:32:56Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1974/15259
dc.description.abstractIn the post-Enlightenment period, Anglo-American criminal law has been applied with increased force, and an ever expanding scope, to collective actors like corporations and other organizations. Recent scholarship has focused on developing “truly organizational” bases of liability that break with the conventional approach of imputing individual conduct to an organization and instead analyze culpable conduct and intent in a way that reflects the distinct and independent capacity of organizations to pursue their interests or goals collaboratively. In 2004, Canada enacted amendments inspired by these ideas in the hope they would lead to more effective criminal enforcement against organizations. Twelve years later, however, the promise of Bill C-45 is largely unfulfilled. In this thesis, I explore how much of this failure of law reform to deliver transformational change is attributable to an individualist bias that permeates how we think about what it means to be responsible and how this then shapes the responsibility ascription process. Using an analytical framework that combines criminal law theory with selected aspects of rational-structural theory and organization culture, I suggest that a promising way forward may lie in reframing the essential qualities required to be a subject of the criminal law in a way that captures the unique attributes that make organizations different from individuals. The resulting organizational concept of responsible agency allows for an integration of organizational reality into how we assess organizational culpability while keeping the ambit of criminal liability within the limits of what is practicable and fair. This better aligns with the spirit of Bill C-45: to impose criminal liability in a way that takes organizations – and their crimes – seriously.en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCanadian thesesen
dc.rightsQueen's University's Thesis/Dissertation Non-Exclusive License for Deposit to QSpace and Library and Archives Canadaen
dc.rightsProQuest PhD and Master's Theses International Dissemination Agreementen
dc.rightsIntellectual Property Guidelines at Queen's Universityen
dc.rightsCopying and Preserving Your Thesisen
dc.rightsThis publication is made available by the authority of the copyright owner solely for the purpose of private study and research and may not be copied or reproduced except as permitted by the copyright laws without written authority from the copyright owner.en
dc.subjectCorporate Criminal Liabilityen
dc.subjectCriminal Lawen
dc.subjectOrganizationsen
dc.subjectPhilosophy of Criminal Lawen
dc.subjectCollective Responsibilityen
dc.titleTaking Organizations Seriously: Responsible Agency, Organizations and the Criminal Lawen
dc.typethesisen
dc.description.degreePhDen
dc.contributor.supervisorCockfield, J. Arthuren
dc.contributor.departmentLawen
dc.embargo.termsI wish to restrict my thesis for the 5 year period in order to protect my ability to publish the thesis as a monograph with an academic or a commercial publisher.en
dc.embargo.liftdate2021-11-29T21:41:00Z
dc.degree.grantorQueen's University at Kingstonen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record