Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBracken-Roche, Ciara
dc.contributor.otherQueen's University (Kingston, Ont.). Theses (Queen's University (Kingston, Ont.))en
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-23T16:32:02Z
dc.date.available2018-01-23T16:32:02Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1974/23840
dc.description.abstractIn this dissertation, I undertake an in-depth examination of the stakeholder networks and narratives that are driving and shaping drone technologies and corresponding policy within Canada. It examines how and why some stakeholder groups have been excluded from various regulatory processes for drones, and how the inclusion and exclusion of certain groups in regulatory processes impacts the deployment of these technologies, and thus impacts on privacy and civil liberties. The adoption and use of drone technologies represents and perpetuates a politics of verticality that allows particular stakeholder groups to control Canada’s sociotechnical space through policy, and this contributes to a privileged vertical gaze where only particular groups and technologies can operate drones. This dissertation theorizes Canadian drone space as being shaped by the logics of dominant stakeholder groups, and addresses the ways in which civil liberties and privacy implications as well as surveillance-sensitive aspects of drones are not adequately addressed because of who is excluded from these spaces. This dissertation argues how the seemingly benign relationships between particular stakeholder groups in Canadian drone space are the product of a ‘revolving door’ in the surveillance-industrial complex. The relationships that have developed around drones between certain stakeholder groups (primarily government, industry, and military) show how other stakeholder groups (such as civil liberties advocates, lawyers, and privacy experts) have long been excluded from the development of drone regulation processes in Canada. I put these politics of exclusion into dialogue with Andrew Barry’s theory of technological zones and Pierre Bourdieu’s field theory. These theories help to explain how the field of power within which stakeholders operate contributes to them a) only associating with specific stakeholder groups, b) upholding particular logics and predispositions about drone technologies, and c) perpetuating discourses and narratives about the technological zone of drones that impacts the technologies themselves, the regulation of drones, and Canada’s sociotechnical space more broadly. Drawing on semi-structured interviews with stakeholders as well as extensive analyses of primary documents obtained through Access to Information and Privacy requests, these data are parsed through thematically to demonstrate the contrasting positions of stakeholder groups in the regulatory process, in assessing risk and the market, and in media portrayals of drone technologies.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCanadian thesesen
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.rightsQueen's University's Thesis/Dissertation Non-Exclusive License for Deposit to QSpace and Library and Archives Canadaen
dc.rightsProQuest PhD and Master's Theses International Dissemination Agreementen
dc.rightsIntellectual Property Guidelines at Queen's Universityen
dc.rightsCopying and Preserving Your Thesisen
dc.rightsThis publication is made available by the authority of the copyright owner solely for the purpose of private study and research and may not be copied or reproduced except as permitted by the copyright laws without written authority from the copyright owner.en
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectCanadaen_US
dc.subjectDronesen_US
dc.subjectStakeholdersen_US
dc.subjectPolicyen_US
dc.subjectContemporary sociological theoryen_US
dc.titleNavigating Canadian Drone Space: A Sociological Analysis of the Stakeholders, Narratives, and Policy Shaping Canadian Unmanned Systemsen_US
dc.typethesisen
dc.description.degreeDoctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.contributor.supervisorLyon, David
dc.contributor.departmentSociologyen_US
dc.embargo.termsI would like to restrict my thesis for publication and dissemination reasons, including sensitive nature of some of the analysis for the Canadian drone space currently.en_US
dc.embargo.liftdate2023-01-23T15:09:18Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States