Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMertel, Kurt Cihan Muraten
dc.date2007-09-19 12:00:15.908
dc.date.accessioned2007-09-25T18:29:55Z
dc.date.available2007-09-25T18:29:55Z
dc.date.issued2007-09-25T18:29:55Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1974/702
dc.descriptionThesis (Master, Philosophy) -- Queen's University, 2007-09-19 12:00:15.908en
dc.description.abstractThis paper deals with an important problem in contemporary political thought: the problem of ‘minorities within minorities’. The problem lies in the fact that, on one hand, while illiberal cultural or religious groups may seek to impose internal restrictions on their members which violate their basic rights as citizens - in the name of the freedom of religion/conscience, and/or cultural preservation – the state has a responsibility to protect the members of such groups from harm. On the other hand, the state would be overstepping the boundaries of legitimate authority - ignoring the freedom of association and conscience - if it intervened in the affairs of such groups to forcibly change their internal structure to cohere with liberal values. The necessity of a right to exit one’s inherited religious or cultural community has been widely acknowledged by philosophers as a solution to the problem of internal minorities, in that, it is seen both as a means to protect individuals from oppressive cultural and religious practices, as well as, establishing the necessary threshold groups must meet in order to be immune from state intervention. But while there may be a broad consensus on the necessity of the right of exit, there is significant disagreement over the specific content of a right: some philosophers support a ‘minimalist’ or formal conception while others endorse a more substantive formulation, which involves supplementation with other negative and positive rights. The aim of this paper is to provide an outline of a substantive right of exit. The conception I defend involves the provision of an array of negative and positive rights and is based on a consistent and unequivocal commitment to autonomy, manifested in its most important element: the provision of a liberal (multicultural) education for minimal autonomy. The upshot of the education requirement for my conception of the right of exit is that it possesses considerable transformative power in addition to an enhanced protective role. The distinctiveness of my account revolves around its emphasis on the transformative function of exit, which seeks to address the underlying problem by focusing on the long-term challenge of 'liberalizing' cultures.en
dc.format.extent565757 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoengen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCanadian thesesen
dc.rightsThis publication is made available by the authority of the copyright owner solely for the purpose of private study and research and may not be copied or reproduced except as permitted by the copyright laws without written authority from the copyright owner.en
dc.subjectpolitical philosophyen
dc.titleToward a Substantive Right of Exiten
dc.typethesisen
dc.description.degreeM.A.en
dc.contributor.supervisorKymlicka, Willen
dc.contributor.departmentPhilosophyen
dc.degree.grantorQueen's University at Kingstonen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record