Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPfeffer, Danen
dc.date2014-01-28 18:13:12.34
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-29T19:58:32Z
dc.date.available2014-01-29T19:58:32Z
dc.date.issued2014-01-29
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1974/8592
dc.descriptionThesis (Ph.D, Political Studies) -- Queen's University, 2014-01-28 18:13:12.34en
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation argues that we ought to promote the integration of groups as groups. Group integration is characterised by the process through which a group develops its own institutions and becomes a participatory member of its host society. This dissertation is neither a refutation of previous literature on individual integration, nor is it a rejection of the idea that immigrant groups are owed different rights than are national minorities and aboriginal groups. Instead, the goal is to fortify our understanding of what treatment is owed to immigrant groups. This dissertation argues that it is normatively desirable to promote group integration both for instrumental benefits in terms of expediting individual integration, and due to reasons of justice and democratic equality between groups. Chapters Two, Three, and Four are predominantly theoretical. They involve a discussion of the importance of group rights and group deliberation, why group integration is normatively desirable, and a response to theoretical critiques of my proposal that group integration ought to be promoted. Chapters Five and Six are based on an application of the theory developed in the preceding chapters, and explore cases where we can see evidence of group integration. It is argued that group integration can justify differentiated rights for immigrant groups that may have integrated, as individuals and groups, under different historical circumstances. The Sixth chapter explores some implications that group integration may have for a group that is not easily characterised by the traditional liberal multiculturalist categories of aboriginal, immigrant group, and national minority. Finally, in Chapter Seven I provide an overview of the three main rubrics of argumentation used in this dissertation.en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCanadian thesesen
dc.rightsThis publication is made available by the authority of the copyright owner solely for the purpose of private study and research and may not be copied or reproduced except as permitted by the copyright laws without written authority from the copyright owner.en
dc.subjectMulticulturalismen
dc.subjectImmigrant groupsen
dc.subjectCanadian Politicsen
dc.subjectDiversityen
dc.titleGroup Integrationen
dc.typethesisen
dc.description.degreePhDen
dc.contributor.supervisorLister, Andrewen
dc.contributor.departmentPolitical Studiesen
dc.degree.grantorQueen's University at Kingstonen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record